In a significant push toward India’s clean mobility goals, the Supreme Court has suggested that the Central Government consider banning high-end luxury petrol and diesel cars as an initial step to accelerate the country’s electric vehicle (EV) adoption. The proposal emerged during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking stronger implementation of India’s national EV policies.
Court Highlights Feasibility of Transition in Luxury Segment
A bench headed by Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi observed that India already has a range of premium electric vehicles capable of matching or surpassing the comfort, technology, and performance offered by luxury internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. Since the luxury segment caters to a smaller, affluent consumer base, the Court noted that such a phased restriction would have minimal impact on the average citizen while delivering a strong message on sustainable mobility.
The judges emphasised that a targeted ban on top-end ICE cars could become a practical starting point toward broader EV integration, helping India meet its clean transportation commitments more efficiently.
Centre Indicates Support, Asked to Submit Detailed EV Progress Report
Attorney General R. Venkataramani informed the Court that the government is actively coordinating EV-related efforts across 13 ministries, covering manufacturing, charging infrastructure, fleet electrification, and policy incentives. Acknowledging the Court’s concern, he stated that the Centre is “alive to the issue” and committed to advancing India’s EV mission.
The Supreme Court directed the government to submit a comprehensive status report within four weeks, detailing all circulars, notifications, and actions taken under national EV policy frameworks such as the National Electric Mobility Mission Plan (NEMMP) and the Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEV) policy.
Petitioners Call for Stronger Execution of EV Policies
The PIL, filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) and supported by other public welfare organisations, argues that despite government incentives and policy frameworks, EV charging infrastructure remains insufficient, hampering mass adoption. The petition highlights gaps in implementation timelines, charging network availability, and regulatory coordination between central and state agencies.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the petitioners, urged the Court to compel more measurable and time-bound progress to ensure India remains aligned with global sustainability targets.
Supreme Court Suggests Integrated Infrastructure Approach
During the hearing, the bench reiterated that growing EV demand naturally drives infrastructure development, and a clear regulatory signal—such as curbing luxury ICE sales—could significantly accelerate the process. The judges recommended upgrading existing fuel stations, bus depots, and public transport hubs to include EV charging points, creating a more accessible and reliable nationwide network.
The Court also questioned whether India’s EV policy framework needs an updated roadmap, given that earlier plans were drafted years ago and require adjustments to match today’s market dynamics.
Pilot Projects for Major Cities Under Consideration
As part of a phased approach, the Supreme Court suggested initiating EV transition pilot projects in major metropolitan cities such as Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Chennai, and Kolkata. These cities have high vehicle density and strong EV demand potential, making them ideal environments to test accelerated policy implementation.
A Potential Turning Point for India’s Clean Mobility Journey
If adopted, the Supreme Court’s proposal to restrict luxury petrol and diesel car sales could mark a transformative moment for India’s EV ecosystem. Such a move would signal strong regulatory commitment, drive consumer confidence, attract private investment, and catalyze large-scale infrastructure deployment.
The Court will reconvene after the government submits its detailed EV progress report, a development closely watched by automakers, policymakers, and environmental advocates alike.

